LAM/MPI General User's Mailing List Archives

From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-06 07:12:42

• Next message: Brian Barrett: "Re: LAM: mpirun --machinefile"
• Previous message: Anjin Pradhan: "LAM: possible to use node that's behind a NAT"
• In reply to: Anjin Pradhan: "LAM: possible to use node that's behind a NAT"

On Jun 6, 2009, at 6:18 AM, Anjin Pradhan wrote:

> Is it possible to use a node that behind a NAT in a LAM/MPI?

To clarify your question: is it possible to use a host behind NAT with
hosts that are not behind NAT?

Not really, no. LAM needs all of its processes to be able to open
sockets directly to each other.

-- 
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems

• Next message: Brian Barrett: "Re: LAM: mpirun --machinefile"
• Previous message: Anjin Pradhan: "LAM: possible to use node that's behind a NAT"
• In reply to: Anjin Pradhan: "LAM: possible to use node that's behind a NAT"