All mpi run get this same message.
Single runs don't have any problems.
Here is more informations:
My command: (lamd is running)
mpirun -np 4 fds5_mpi_intel test1-Parallel.fds < /dev/null > log.run 2>&1 &
My system:
Dell R900 with 4 quad core Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X7350 @ 2.93GHz
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.2 (Tikanga) (64 bit)
Linux version 2.6.18-92.1.18.el5 (brewbuilder_at_[hidden])
(gcc version 4.1.2 20071124 (Red Hat 4.1.2-42)) #1 SMP Wed Nov 5 09:00:19
EST 2008
LAM/MPI: 7.1.4
Prefix: /usr/local
Architecture: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured by: root
Configured on: Mon Jan 12 14:31:06 CET 2009
Configure host: srvcal-r900-1
Memory manager: ptmalloc2
C bindings: yes
C++ bindings: yes
Fortran bindings: yes
C compiler: icc
C++ compiler: icpc
Fortran compiler: ifort
Fortran symbols: underscore
C profiling: yes
C++ profiling: yes
Fortran profiling: yes
C++ exceptions: no
Thread support: yes
ROMIO support: yes
IMPI support: no
Debug support: no
Purify clean: no
SSI boot: globus (API v1.1, Module v0.6)
SSI boot: rsh (API v1.1, Module v1.1)
SSI boot: slurm (API v1.1, Module v1.0)
SSI coll: lam_basic (API v1.1, Module v7.1)
SSI coll: shmem (API v1.1, Module v1.0)
SSI coll: smp (API v1.1, Module v1.2)
SSI rpi: crtcp (API v1.1, Module v1.1)
SSI rpi: lamd (API v1.0, Module v7.1)
SSI rpi: sysv (API v1.0, Module v7.1)
SSI rpi: tcp (API v1.0, Module v7.1)
SSI rpi: usysv (API v1.0, Module v7.1)
SSI cr: self (API v1.0, Module v1.0)
2009/3/26 Brian W. Barrett <brbarret_at_[hidden]>
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Axel Bellivier wrote:
>
> i post because a realise that my mpi jobs was as longer as single ones !!
>>
>> The only thing strange i found on logs is:
>>
>> Process 0 of 0 is running on srvcal-r900-1
>> Mesh 1 is assigned to Process 0
>> Mesh 2 is assigned to Process 0
>> Mesh 3 is assigned to Process 0
>> Mesh 4 is assigned to Process 0
>> Process 0 of 0 is running on srvcal-r900-1
>>
>
> From your output, it's hard to tell what's supposed to happen and what
>>
> actually happened. If you run a simple hello world example, does it run
> properly? Is your log of many runs, or a single run? How did you start
> your parallel application?
>
> Brian
>
> --
> Brian Barrett
> LAM/MPI Developer
> Make today a LAM/MPI day!
> _______________________________________________
> This list is archived at http://www.lam-mpi.org/MailArchives/lam/
>
|
