Hi, Jeff:
Thanks for your answer. My server has openmpi installed. I also know MTT for testing openmpi. But my cluster has no access to internet. So I have to use lamtest. If you have any advice, that would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks again.
Steven Wang
ÔÚ2008-10-17£¬"Jeff Squyres" <jsquyres_at_[hidden]> дµÀ£º
>LAM does not know anything about udapl, so I'm not sure how you could
>be generating these messages unless you are somehow mixing MPI
>implementations (perhaps mixing Open MPI and LAM/MPI somehow? Even
>so; Open MPI doesn't build udapl by default on Linux because it
>prefers native verbs support).
>
>Note that the "make check" mechanism in the Open MPI SVN version of
>the ibm test suite is not used much; it may or may not be 100%
>functional (i.e., it may have bit rotted over time). I typically use
>the MPI Testing Tool (MTT) to run all the IBM tests; MTT is much more
>reliable and flexible. MTT finds all the executables that were
>generated by "make" and runs them by itself, not via "make check".
>For example, here's Cisco's Open MPI testing results from the IBM test
>suite from yesterday:
>
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mtt/index.php?do_redir=868
>
>
>
>On Oct 17, 2008, at 3:55 AM, Steven wrote:
>
>> Hi Tim and Jeff:
>>
>> You are right that I combined some *.o files into my compiling
>> server. These objective files were compiled on differnt enviroment,
>> which resulted in the issue. I removed them and rerun make. This
>> time make or make -k is clear. When I run "make -k check", the
>> output has continous warning such as
>>
>> WARNING: Failed to open
>> "ib0" [DAT_PROVIDER_NOT_FOUND:DAT_NAME_NOT_REGISTERED].
>> This may be a real error or it may be an invalid entry in the uDAPL
>> Registry which is contained in the dat.conf file. Contact your local
>> System Administrator to confirm the availability of the interfaces in
>> the dat.conf file.
>>
>> My servers have one Infiniband ConnectX adapter connected. It looks
>> that lamtest will detect the IB network. At the output end of "make -
>> k check", it wrote
>>
>> PASS: sub
>> ==================
>> All 4 tests passed
>>
>> I am not sure how many test cases have been executed (only four
>> cases?). And whether 100% of them has succeeded or not.
>>
>> Thanks a lot for your attetion!
>>
>> Steven Wang
>> ÔÚ2008-10-16£¬"Tim Prince"
|
