LAM/MPI General User's Mailing List Archives

From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-19 16:08:01

• Next message: McCalla, Mac: "Re: LAM: problem with mpirun - processes don't 'see' one another"
• Previous message: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: problem with mpirun - processes don't 'see' one another"
• In reply to: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: problem with mpirun - processes don't 'see' one another"
• Next in thread: McCalla, Mac: "Re: LAM: problem with mpirun - processes don't 'see' one another"
• Reply: McCalla, Mac: "Re: LAM: problem with mpirun - processes don't 'see' one another"

On May 19, 2008, at 3:59 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:

> lamrun is for non-MPI executables (e.g., /bin/uptime).

Sorry -- I was thinking of "lamexec", not "lamrun". Did Fedora really
provide a lamrun and/or not fully use the alternatives system? That's
just darn weird. Sorry for the confusion.

Sigh. How many years was I a LAM developer? ;-)

-- 
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems

• Next message: McCalla, Mac: "Re: LAM: problem with mpirun - processes don't 'see' one another"
• Previous message: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: problem with mpirun - processes don't 'see' one another"
• In reply to: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: problem with mpirun - processes don't 'see' one another"
• Next in thread: McCalla, Mac: "Re: LAM: problem with mpirun - processes don't 'see' one another"
• Reply: McCalla, Mac: "Re: LAM: problem with mpirun - processes don't 'see' one another"