LAM/MPI General User's Mailing List Archives

From: Simon Prunet (prunet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-15 08:53:15

• Next message: Jeff Squyres \(jsquyres\): "Re: LAM: lam + openpbs stack limitation"
• Previous message: Warner Yuen: "LAM: Mac OS X heterogeneous cluster mpirun problem"
• Next in thread: Jeff Squyres \(jsquyres\): "Re: LAM: lam + openpbs stack limitation"
• Maybe reply: Jeff Squyres \(jsquyres\): "Re: LAM: lam + openpbs stack limitation"
• Reply: Hugh Merz: "Re: LAM: lam + openpbs stack limitation"

Dear LAM/MPIers,

We have here a cluster of opterons, running Suse
with OpenPBS and Lam-mpi (7.1.1).

It seems that the combination of openpbs queuing
and lam mpirun result in a stack size limit of 8192 kb,
which for some fortran codes can result in segfaults.

I have checked that openpbs alone, or mpirun alone
do not result in this limit, but only the combination of
both...

Has anyone encountered this problem ?

Thanks for your help !

Simon

PS: I can provide further details if needed

• Next message: Jeff Squyres \(jsquyres\): "Re: LAM: lam + openpbs stack limitation"
• Previous message: Warner Yuen: "LAM: Mac OS X heterogeneous cluster mpirun problem"
• Next in thread: Jeff Squyres \(jsquyres\): "Re: LAM: lam + openpbs stack limitation"
• Maybe reply: Jeff Squyres \(jsquyres\): "Re: LAM: lam + openpbs stack limitation"
• Reply: Hugh Merz: "Re: LAM: lam + openpbs stack limitation"