Brian,
Thank you for your time. I will put LAM 7.1.1 onto my workstation.
I would like to thank the entire LAM development team for doing such a
great job with LAM-MPI. (I don't have any experience with other MPI
implementations, and my experience with LAM is limited, but I think
you guys are doing a top notch job with this one).
Lucas
mailto:lucshaw_at_[hidden]
Sunday, December 4, 2005, 3:31:55 PM, you wrote:
BB> On Dec 4, 2005, at 5:28 PM, Lucas R. Shaw wrote:
>> Yes I understand that. I don't transfer the object files from my
>> development machine to the cluster. I can compile on the cluster as
>> well, but I like to do small test runs on my local machine. Yes I
>> think you are right about the linking issues being a G++ problem. In
>> this case, does it make sense to use LAM 7.1.1 on my test machine
>> (since it works with gcc 4.0)? Otherwise, I may try installing the
>> older gcc 3.2 compiler (which I believe is the same compiler that our
>> cluster uses).
BB> I would use the latest version of LAM on your workstation. There are
BB> very few MPI features that are in LAM 7.1.1 but not in LAM 6.5.9.
BB> Most of the changes are bug fixes and "under the covers" features,
BB> like the ability to support multiple devices.
BB> Brian
|
