Thanks a lot for your answer. That solves my doubts.
Best,
R.
On 11/30/05, Jeff Squyres <jsquyres_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Nov 26, 2005, at 6:34 PM, Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
>
> > However, the FAQ and the manual seem to suggest that issuing multiple
> > lamboots should only be done in very special circumstances. I've been
> > searching the mailing list and doing several google searches, and
> > haven't found anything else relevant. What are the problems I am
> > likely to run into? Would anyone care to comment?
>
> Sorry for the delay in replying -- SC and the US holiday generated a
> huge backlog of mails that we're just getting to...
>
> It sounds like what you're doing is exactly what SESSION_SUFFIX is
> intended for. We warn against it simply to ensure that people think
> about what they're doing before doing it (i.e., you should only use
> SESSION_SUFFIX if you really need to).
>
> --
> {+} Jeff Squyres
> {+} The Open MPI Project
> {+} http://www.open-mpi.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> This list is archived at http://www.lam-mpi.org/MailArchives/lam/
>
--
Ramon Diaz-Uriarte
Bioinformatics Unit
Spanish National Cancer Centre (CNIO)
http://ligarto.org/rdiaz
|
