On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 08:23:55AM -0800, Geoffrey Irving wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 08:15:50AM -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> > On Nov 20, 2005, at 6:18 PM, Geoffrey Irving wrote:
> >
> > > Ah, apparently I'm not always running 7.1.1 (I just noticed that).
> > > I imagine compiling and linking with one version of lam and then
> > > running under a different version is not supported. Still, it
> > > would be nice if there was a slightly better error message in that
> > > case.
> >
> > Yes, this can definitely be a problem. Also make sure that you're
> > running in 32 bit mode on both sides; LAM does not support both 32 and
> > 64 bit processes in the same parallel job (more specifically: it may
> > work and it may not -- we make no guarantees and do no error checking
> > for this case). Let us know if you are able to run correctly after
> > getting the versioning issues worked out.
>
> Unfortunately, I fixed the versioning issues and the problem is unchanged.
> Here's my laminfo (which is now the same on both machines):
>
> LAM/MPI: 7.1.1
> <snip>
The problem disappears (at least for my reduced bug.cpp) in 7.1.2b28.
Geoffrey
|
