On Oct 19, 2005, at 9:52 AM, Joost de Greef wrote:
> I'm trying to make a lam version that differs from
> the one that is installed by default on the cluster I
> have to use. Compiling with --program-suffix=-lam nicely
> adds -lam to all the executables, but for some reason lam
> still looks for some executables without the extension.
> I could use lam by creating links without the -lam for
> hboot, tkill and lamd, and making sure these appear in
> my PATH before the system executables, but this is something
> I would like to avoid.
> Did I do something ovbious wrong?
LAM/MPI currently does not support the use of the program transform
features of configure. Unfortunately, there's no way to get rid of
the options (that I'm aware of), as some macro we uses requires the
macro that provides those configure options. To be honest, no one
has asked about it in the last many years, so it's never really
popped up on our radar to look at. I'm taking a look at supporting
the program name transform features in 7.1.2, but I can't make any
promises. Until then, our only recommendation is to not use the
program transform options to configure.
Brian
--
Brian Barrett
LAM/MPI developer and all around nice guy
Have a LAM/MPI day: http://www.lam-mpi.org/
|
