LAM/MPI General User's Mailing List Archives

From: Brian Barrett (brbarret_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-03 08:25:56

• Next message: Jeffrey Squyres: "Re: LAM: MPI_XXX_c2f on MPI_XXX_NULL"
• Previous message: Anthony Chan: "Re: LAM: MPI_XXX_c2f on MPI_XXX_NULL"
• In reply to: Anthony Chan: "LAM: MPI_XXX_c2f on MPI_XXX_NULL"
• Next in thread: Jeffrey Squyres: "Re: LAM: MPI_XXX_c2f on MPI_XXX_NULL"
• Reply: Jeffrey Squyres: "Re: LAM: MPI_XXX_c2f on MPI_XXX_NULL"

On Aug 2, 2005, at 3:26 PM, Anthony Chan wrote:

> With lam712b22, the following program caught signal 11 with any of
> MPI_XXX_c2f( MPI_XXX_NULL ).

Anthony -

Thank you for bringing this to our attention. All of the MPI_*_c2f
functions did not properly deal with the MPI_*_NULL handles. This
has been fixed in Subversion and will be part of LAM/MPI 7.1.2.

Thanks,

Brian.

-- 
   Brian Barrett
   LAM/MPI developer and all around nice guy
   Have a LAM/MPI day: http://www.lam-mpi.org/

• Next message: Jeffrey Squyres: "Re: LAM: MPI_XXX_c2f on MPI_XXX_NULL"
• Previous message: Anthony Chan: "Re: LAM: MPI_XXX_c2f on MPI_XXX_NULL"
• In reply to: Anthony Chan: "LAM: MPI_XXX_c2f on MPI_XXX_NULL"
• Next in thread: Jeffrey Squyres: "Re: LAM: MPI_XXX_c2f on MPI_XXX_NULL"
• Reply: Jeffrey Squyres: "Re: LAM: MPI_XXX_c2f on MPI_XXX_NULL"