LAM/MPI General User's Mailing List Archives

From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-15 19:07:57

• Next message: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: rpi-modules tcp vs sysv and Speed advantages"
• Previous message: Samuel M. Goosen: "LAM: Lam and multinode BLCR"
• In reply to: Shreyas Bhatewara: "Re: LAM: The node choosing different RPI than its peer."

On Jul 15, 2005, at 2:06 AM, Shreyas Bhatewara wrote:

> I want to be sure that the cluster setup is flaw-less.
> It is critical for me. Is the 'running of test suite
> successfully' a sufficient indicator to correct setup
> of LAM-MPI?

In general, yes.

-- 
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} jsquyres_at_[hidden]
{+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/

• Next message: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: rpi-modules tcp vs sysv and Speed advantages"
• Previous message: Samuel M. Goosen: "LAM: Lam and multinode BLCR"
• In reply to: Shreyas Bhatewara: "Re: LAM: The node choosing different RPI than its peer."