On May 6, 2005, at 9:43 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> OK. If you do this again, please try to change the `--version' output
> to indicate this. Makes it easier to blame.
Sure -- something like "1.5.14lam"? I.e., is anything other than
"1.5.14" sufficient so that it's a clear "this is not a vanilla Libtool
release" kind of thing?
> (I'd need to look whether
> we do version checking in branch-1-5, so in case of doubt just change
> the lines which output the version string rather than the version
> number).
>
> Not in this case, though, I think. Haven't analyzed, but that's what I
> going to hopefully get done before 1.5.18 so that you don't need
> another
> patch.
Great -- thanks!
--
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} jsquyres_at_[hidden]
{+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/
|
