Hi Jeff,
* Jeff Squyres wrote on Fri, May 06, 2005 at 03:13:05PM CEST:
> On May 5, 2005, at 1:38 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> >This patch is ok as a hint.
> >What I now need (I work on Libtool rather than on LAM):
> >The output of
> > ./libtool --version
> >a copy of the command line plus error message of the failure (both the
> >line starting with something like "libtool --mode=link.." as well as
> >what libtool generates), so that I can check that we have a test which
> >exposes this failure.
>
> We do something horrid when we make the LAM tarball -- we take LT
> 1.5.14 and patch it for PGI support (we did this before 1.5.16 was
> available, and per your advice, we're waiting for 1.5.18).
OK. If you do this again, please try to change the `--version' output
to indicate this. Makes it easier to blame. (I'd need to look whether
we do version checking in branch-1-5, so in case of doubt just change
the lines which output the version string rather than the version
number).
Not in this case, though, I think. Haven't analyzed, but that's what I
going to hopefully get done before 1.5.18 so that you don't need another
patch.
> Attached is the patch that we apply.
Thanks.
Regards,
Ralf
|
