LAM/MPI General User's Mailing List Archives

From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-15 19:10:43

• Next message: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: LAMMPI using GM with OS X 10.3"
• Previous message: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: take 2"
• In reply to: joe dumoulin: "Re: LAM: take 2"
• Next in thread: Understudy: "Re: LAM: take 2"
• Reply: Understudy: "Re: LAM: take 2"

On Apr 15, 2005, at 7:19 PM, joe dumoulin wrote:

> I'm not sure I understand your question about master and slave. lam
> really doesnt care about that. You can write software using lam to
> implement master/slave or other node relationships though it has
> nothing
> to do with the installation (at least as far as I know, and I am
> definitely not an expert).

You are correct. Thanks for the clarification!

-- 
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} jsquyres_at_[hidden]
{+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/

• Next message: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: LAMMPI using GM with OS X 10.3"
• Previous message: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: take 2"
• In reply to: joe dumoulin: "Re: LAM: take 2"
• Next in thread: Understudy: "Re: LAM: take 2"
• Reply: Understudy: "Re: LAM: take 2"