Jack,
I appreciate your reply. The "gcc: invalid version number format" was in the
configuration log. Actually, the code can be compiled successfully. My Dell
laptop runs Linux 2.4.21-rc2-ac2 (Redhat 9.0). It has a 1.6GHz Intel Pentium
processor.
I typed command laminfo and got the following:
LAM/MPI: 7.0.6
Prefix: /usr
Architecture: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured by: jsquyres
Configured on: Wed May 12 13:43:50 EST 2004
Configure host: eddie.osl.iu.edu
C bindings: yes
C++ bindings: yes
Fortran bindings: yes
C profiling: yes
C++ profiling: yes
Fortran profiling: yes
ROMIO support: yes
IMPI support: no
Debug support: no
Purify clean: no
SSI boot: globus (Module v0.5)
SSI boot: rsh (Module v1.0)
SSI coll: lam_basic (Module v7.0)
SSI coll: smp (Module v1.0)
SSI rpi: crtcp (Module v1.0.1)
SSI rpi: lamd (Module v7.0)
SSI rpi: sysv (Module v7.0)
SSI rpi: tcp (Module v7.0)
SSI rpi: usysv (Module v7.0)
Thanks,
Guanhua
On Monday 28 March 2005 19:12, Jack wrote:
> Guanhua Yan wrote:
> >I am pretty sure that "lamboot" is successfully done. And the LAM version
> > is 7.0.6. And the gcc version is "3.2.2". I did observe "gcc: invalid
> > version number format" in the configuration log. but I am not sure
> > whether this is the real reason.
>
> "laminfo" will tell you if everything is correctly booted. Let me see if
> I have this straight: You have the code, and when trying to compile it,
> it says "gcc: invalid version number format" and that's all? Can you
> tell us your system type, OS, arcitecture... that would help.
>
> -Jack Carrozzo
> http://www.crepinc.com/
|
