How about a galaxy?
Robert LeBlanc
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lam-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:lam-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf
> Of Jeff Squyres
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 2:46 PM
> To: General LAM/MPI mailing list
> Subject: Re: LAM: lam operational mode name question
>
> That's a good enough name for it. You're using a universe -- you're
> just using a subset of the available resources. So it's really LAM's
> normal operating mode -- it just so happens that most people use *all*
> resources after they lamboot.
>
>
> On Mar 17, 2005, at 4:25 PM, Phil Ehrens wrote:
>
> > What is the correct name for the lam operating mode
> > where one defines a comm universe via lamboot, and then
> > uses a subset of the defined universe to run jobs without
> > running lamboot?
> >
> > My own term is "Persistent lamd mode", but perhaps
> > there is a canonical name for this? I am intending to
> > write an article on low latency batch processing with
> > lam for the MPI Wiki (see http://www.mpi-comm-world.org/).
> >
> > --
> > Phil Ehrens <pehrens_at_[hidden]>| Fun stuff:
> > The LIGO Laboratory, MS 18-34 | http://www.ralphmag.org
> > California Institute of Technology | http://www.yellow5.com
> > 1200 East California Blvd. | http://www.total.net/~fishnet/
> > Pasadena, CA 91125 USA | http://slashdot.org
> > Phone:(626)395-8518 Fax:(626)793-9744 | http://kame56.homepage.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > This list is archived at http://www.lam-mpi.org/MailArchives/lam/
> >
>
> --
> {+} Jeff Squyres
> {+} jsquyres_at_[hidden]
> {+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> This list is archived at http://www.lam-mpi.org/MailArchives/lam/
>
>
>
|
