On Mar 16, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Ilya Lashuk wrote:
>> Hum. That's quite odd. Can you send the output of "make" from when
>> you built LAM/MPI? I'd like to see how it built the totalview
>> library. It *shouldn't* be stripped. Also check that it was
>> installed properly -- look in $prefix/lib/lam -- do you see
>> liblam_totalview.so.0.0.0 in there? What do you get when you run file
>> and ldd on it?
>
> Attached is make output. Here's the list of files in $prefix/lib/lam:
> liblam_totalview.la liblam_totalview.so liblam_totalview.so.0
> liblam_totalview.so.0.0.0
>
> Sorry, i don't know what "ldd on file" means - please tell me.
Sorry, I meant:
shell$ ldd liblam_totalview.so.0.0.0.0
You ran this in the reply you just sent, and it looks good. Indeed,
from the make output, it looks like liblam_totalview.so is being built
properly. Hmm.
Please run "file liblam_totalview.so.0.0.0.0".
Just curious -- do you only have one MPI implementation installed on
your cluster (LAM/MPI 7.1.1)? If you have more than one, are you sure
that you have your PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH setup properly such that
they point to the 7.1.1 install?
What was the exact command line that you used to configure LAM/MPI?
(look in the first few lines of config.log in the LAM source directory)
--
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} jsquyres_at_[hidden]
{+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/
|
