At 06:25 AM 3/8/2005, Jeff Squyres wrote:
Yes, having the information in laminfo should work. The newest version of
lam which I have installed at the moment is 7.0.3, which complains on
'laminfo -all.' I don't see anything in laminfo which gives the desired
information on 32- or 64- bit build mode; I'd try implementing something,
if that is reasonable to do.
>Can you just use the laminfo command instead? (the lamboot -V info is
>only maintained for hysterical raisins)
>
>laminfo was intended to be the vehicle for all this kind of information --
>it offers it in both prettyprint and easily parsable formats. For
>example, try:
>
>laminfo -all -parsable | grep pointer
>
>
>On Mar 8, 2005, at 9:21 AM, Tim Prince wrote:
>
>>Several of us agreed we would like to try adding an indication of how lam
>>was built to the lamboot message. Specifically, for an x86-64 system, we
>>would like to have it confirm whether it is a 32- or 64-bit lam. Could
>>someone point me to where the message is generated, so I could experiment?
>>
>>Tim Prince
Tim Prince
|
