Can you just use the laminfo command instead? (the lamboot -V info is
only maintained for hysterical raisins)
laminfo was intended to be the vehicle for all this kind of information
-- it offers it in both prettyprint and easily parsable formats. For
example, try:
laminfo -all -parsable | grep pointer
On Mar 8, 2005, at 9:21 AM, Tim Prince wrote:
> Several of us agreed we would like to try adding an indication of how
> lam was built to the lamboot message. Specifically, for an x86-64
> system, we would like to have it confirm whether it is a 32- or 64-bit
> lam. Could someone point me to where the message is generated, so I
> could experiment?
>
> Tim Prince
> _______________________________________________
> This list is archived at http://www.lam-mpi.org/MailArchives/lam/
>
--
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} jsquyres_at_[hidden]
{+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/
|
