LAM/MPI General User's Mailing List Archives

From: Tim Prince (tprince_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-08 09:21:19

• Next message: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: lamboot message"
• Previous message: Luiz Angelo Barchet Steffenel: "LAM: IMPI odd behaviour"
• Next in thread: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: lamboot message"
• Reply: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: lamboot message"

Several of us agreed we would like to try adding an indication of how lam
was built to the lamboot message. Specifically, for an x86-64 system, we
would like to have it confirm whether it is a 32- or 64-bit lam. Could
someone point me to where the message is generated, so I could experiment?

Tim Prince

• Next message: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: lamboot message"
• Previous message: Luiz Angelo Barchet Steffenel: "LAM: IMPI odd behaviour"
• Next in thread: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: lamboot message"
• Reply: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: lamboot message"