> From:
> Christian F. Vélez Witrofsky <cfvelez_at_[hidden]>
>
>...
>MPITB & Octave on our project in the comming weeks and I'll be sure to
>let you know how it went (asuming it all goes well).
>
>
>
Hi Christian,
Please, please, let me know if you manage to use more than 16 computers.
That's the most node-spreaded documented Octave/LAM parallel application
so far,
by Michael Creel. I'm just 2nd in the record with 8 nodes :-)
I'll gladly link any new "record", and of course any paper you write
about it.
Michael's and mine are already there
http://atc.ugr.es/~javier/investigacion/papers/mpitb_octave_papers.html
BTW, in the Octave mailing-list we have also talked on that (parallel
LAM/Octave)
http://www.octave.org/octave-lists/archive/help-octave.2005/threads.html#00172
http://www.octave.org/octave-lists/archive/help-octave.2004/threads.html#02305
> Regards,
> nelson
>
> Nelson de Brito
> http://www.fc.up.pt/pessoas/ntbrito
Hi, Nelson,
Yep! You are a Computational Chemist!!! Sorry I didn't follow the link
before.
Just on the first Octave thread above I was asking for sequential
time-consuming
Octave code dealing on Chemics, to paralelize it...
If only you used Octave! :-)
-javier
|
