LAM/MPI General User's Mailing List Archives

From: Bryan O'Sullivan (bos_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-16 15:22:17

• Next message: Josh Hursey: "Re: LAM: Problem in MPI_Send/MPI_Recv for 3-D Array"
• Previous message: David Cronk: "LAM: Dynamic process management"
• In reply to: Bryan O'Sullivan: "LAM: Who's using MPI-2 features of LAM?"
• Next in thread: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: Re: Who's using MPI-2 features of LAM?"
• Reply: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: Re: Who's using MPI-2 features of LAM?"
• Reply: etienne gondet: "Re: LAM: Re: Who's using MPI-2 features of LAM?"

On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 15:28 -0800, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:

> I can summarise responses for the list, if anyone is interested.

The answer, for those who are interested, is that apparently nobody uses
MPI-2 at all. One person responded that he'd have used non-blocking
collectives if they had been available in an MPI implementation when he
was writing his app. Another noted that she couldn't find any MPI-2
code in the wild, either.

        <b

• Next message: Josh Hursey: "Re: LAM: Problem in MPI_Send/MPI_Recv for 3-D Array"
• Previous message: David Cronk: "LAM: Dynamic process management"
• In reply to: Bryan O'Sullivan: "LAM: Who's using MPI-2 features of LAM?"
• Next in thread: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: Re: Who's using MPI-2 features of LAM?"
• Reply: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: Re: Who's using MPI-2 features of LAM?"
• Reply: etienne gondet: "Re: LAM: Re: Who's using MPI-2 features of LAM?"