LAM/MPI General User's Mailing List Archives

What's New

Overview

Publications

MPI Resources

LAM Team

Other Implementations

Documentation

Tutorials

FAQ

Getting Help

LAM Tools

MPI Applications

Supported Versions

Download

Installation Process

Test Suite

Beta Releases

Source Code Access

Mailing Lists

Performance Data

Mirrors

Contact

License

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Angel Tsankov (fn42551_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-04 13:04:45

Next message: Phil Ehrens: "Re: LAM: Negative rank or communicator size?"
Previous message: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: Next lamboot/slurm problem"
Next in thread: Phil Ehrens: "Re: LAM: Negative rank or communicator size?"
Reply: Phil Ehrens: "Re: LAM: Negative rank or communicator size?"
Maybe reply: Curry Matthew J CRBE: "RE: LAM: Negative rank or communicator size?"

Why do functions such as MPI_Comm_rank and MPI_Comm_size return int instead
of unsigned int?

Next message: Phil Ehrens: "Re: LAM: Negative rank or communicator size?"
Previous message: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: Next lamboot/slurm problem"
Next in thread: Phil Ehrens: "Re: LAM: Negative rank or communicator size?"
Reply: Phil Ehrens: "Re: LAM: Negative rank or communicator size?"
Maybe reply: Curry Matthew J CRBE: "RE: LAM: Negative rank or communicator size?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view