LAM/MPI logo

LAM/MPI General User's Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Download   |   Documentation   |   FAQ   |   all just in this list

From: Tabish Almas (tabish_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-12-22 16:30:54


I was finally able to lamboot successfuly.
Thanks a lot for your help.

Now I will try to compile LAM with intel compilers and see whether that
works too.

-Tabish

 

-----Original Message-----
From: lam-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:lam-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of
Jeff Squyres
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 12:55 PM
To: General LAM/MPI mailing list
Subject: Re: LAM: Lamboot problems

The real question is why you don't have the rsh boot module, which is what
it should be using.

I think the answer lies in the command you used to configure LAM. I notice
that you included the option:

         "--with-rsh=--with-rsh=/usr/bin/ssh -x"

I think you accidentally listed --with-rsh in there twice. Change it
to:

        "--with-rsh=/usr/bin/ssh -x"

On Dec 22, 2004, at 12:31 PM, Tabish Almas wrote:

>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> I went ahead and compiled lam with gnu compilers.
> But still I get the same error during lamboot,
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> -----
> -
> No SSI boot modules said that they were available to run. This should
> not happen.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> -----
> -
>
>
> I'm attaching the new config.log file.
>
>
> Sorry but I didn't understand the 'pthread' and 'glibc' problems that
> you mentioned.
> Could you please explain it.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Tabish
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lam-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:lam-bounces_at_[hidden]] On
> Behalf Of Tim Prince
> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 11:27 AM
> To: General LAM/MPI mailing list; General LAM/MPI mailing list;
> lam_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: LAM: Lamboot problems
>
> At 08:09 AM 12/22/2004, Tim Prince wrote:
>
>> At 07:40 AM 12/22/2004, Tabish Almas wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am trying to install Lam 7.0.6 on our Linux cluster with Intel
>>> nodes.
>>>
>>> I have compiled lam 7.0.6 with intel compiler version 8.0.
>>
>> Might be worth while to upgrade
>>
>>> I set the following variables before using the configure script:
>>>
>>> export CC=icc
>>> export CXX=icc
>>
>> and specify the C++ compiler icpc from the beginning, rather than
>> depending on lam configure to find it.
>> Building with icc and g77 is a bit odd, but it may be OK.
>>
>>> export CFLAGS="-O3 -static -static-libcxa"
>>> export CXXFLAGS="-O3 -static -static-libcxa"
>>
>> not sure if -static has an adverse effect. For example, with RH9,
>> you must upgrade to a current kernel in order to support static
>> pthreads
> library.
>
> Pardon me, that's a glibc upgrade.
>
>
>>> I've attached the zipped config.log file.
>>> I'll appreciate if someone could help me.
>>
>> It says you don't have pthreads support for the way you have
>> configured.
>>
>>
>> Tim Prince
>> _______________________________________________
>> This list is archived at http://www.lam-mpi.org/MailArchives/lam/
>>
>
> Tim Prince
>
> _______________________________________________
> This list is archived at http://www.lam-mpi.org/MailArchives/lam/
> <config.log.gz>_______________________________________________
> This list is archived at http://www.lam-mpi.org/MailArchives/lam/

--
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} jsquyres_at_[hidden]
{+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/
_______________________________________________
This list is archived at http://www.lam-mpi.org/MailArchives/lam/