Both are identical from LAM's view -- they both export the same TM
interface.
On Nov 19, 2004, at 7:56 AM, Andrew Sapronov wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 23:05, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>> It's quite possible that you're doing nothing wrong.
>>
>> I'm not sure how good Torque's CPU time measurer is -- it may be
>> inaccurate. I know that we had some problems with this in Open PBS
>> (although I confess to not remembering the exact issues). It's
>> possible that these problems have not been [yet] fixed in Torque...?
>>
> I'm not satisfied with OpenPBS (too many bugs) and i wanna migrate to
> Torque. Can you advise me which of this system is better to be used
> with LAM.
>
> Andrew Sapronov
>
> _______________________________________________
> This list is archived at http://www.lam-mpi.org/MailArchives/lam/
>
--
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} jsquyres_at_[hidden]
{+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/
|
