Prefer #1 method, should not be a problem to install couple of more
packages on top of lots of packages :-)
Chen
> Jeff Squyres wrote:
>
>> LAM users --
>>
>> If you could indulge me for a minute, I'd like to take a poll of all you
>> "regular users" out there. As you know, we're working heavily on Open MPI
>> (http://www.open-mpi.org/). We anticipate a first stable release in 1Q
>> 2005.
>>
>> SHORT VERSION:
>> --------------
>>
>> 1. If Open MPI uses a build system that requires extra tools (such as cmake
>> or jam or ...) to be installed in order to be built from source, would this
>> be a deterrent to you installing Open MPI from a source tarball?
>>
>> 2. If you answered yes to #1, what kind of system will you want to use Open
>> MPI on? I.e., what [specific] flavor of system (architecture, operating
>> system and version, etc.) would we need to provide a binary version of Open
>> MPI for you to install?
===========================================
Yu Chen
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Chemistry Building, Rm 182
University of Maryland at Baltimore County
1000 Hilltop Circle
Baltimore, MD 21250
phone: (410)455-6347 (primary)
(410)455-2718 (secondary)
fax: (410)455-1174
email: chen_at_[hidden]
===========================================
|
