LAM/MPI General User's Mailing List Archives

From: Ryuta Suzuki (suzu0037_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-12 12:11:50

• Next message: slaton: "Re: LAM: RE: no-schedule=1 broken in 7.11?"
• Previous message: Brian Barrett: "Re: LAM: Concurrent MPI Calls in Threads"
• Next in thread: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: lamexec and lamgrow seg fault"
• Reply: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: lamexec and lamgrow seg fault"

Has anybody experienced seg fault in lamexec and lamgrow? I'm using
Intel compiler 8.1 and gcc 3.4 is installed in the system. I just got
seg fault immediately after I invoke lamexec and lamgrow.

• Next message: slaton: "Re: LAM: RE: no-schedule=1 broken in 7.11?"
• Previous message: Brian Barrett: "Re: LAM: Concurrent MPI Calls in Threads"
• Next in thread: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: lamexec and lamgrow seg fault"
• Reply: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: lamexec and lamgrow seg fault"