LAM/MPI General User's Mailing List Archives

From: Damien Hocking (damien_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-20 09:38:19

• Next message: ducong_at_[hidden]: "Re: LAM: cr_pthread.c:82 cri_pthread_init: When linking libpthread, it must be linked AFTER libcr"
• Previous message: Neville Lee: "Re: LAM: cr_pthread.c:82 cri_pthread_init: When linking libpthread, it must be linked AFTER libcr"
• Next in thread: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: LAM lifespan with OpenMPI on the horizon"
• Reply: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: LAM lifespan with OpenMPI on the horizon"

'Morning all.

This is probably a question for Jeff. Do you envisage that LAM-MPI will
eventually be retired in 2 - 3 years, with the R&D effort moving to
OpenMPI, or will LAM continue as a separate entity? Or is too early to
know?

-- 
Damien Hocking
Light travels faster than sound.  This is why some people appear bright until they speak.

• Next message: ducong_at_[hidden]: "Re: LAM: cr_pthread.c:82 cri_pthread_init: When linking libpthread, it must be linked AFTER libcr"
• Previous message: Neville Lee: "Re: LAM: cr_pthread.c:82 cri_pthread_init: When linking libpthread, it must be linked AFTER libcr"
• Next in thread: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: LAM lifespan with OpenMPI on the horizon"
• Reply: Jeff Squyres: "Re: LAM: LAM lifespan with OpenMPI on the horizon"