Greetings, and thanks as always for your helpful reply!
Jeff Squyres <jsquyres_at_[hidden]> writes:
> We've actually *never* guaranteed binary compatibility between
> releases. We just don't have the time and resources do it,
> unfortunately. That being said, MPI applications *usually* will be ok
> with the upgrades unless we make major changes to:
>
> - mpi.h
> - the inlined C++ bindings
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
What file(s) specify these?
Take care,
> - lam_config.h
>
> These are the only entry points for user applications that need to map
> correctly onto the back-end LAM libraries.
>
> I don't *think* that we changed enough in these files to cause a
> problem between 7.0.x and 7.1, but I know offhand for sure. You would
> have to try it to know. :-\
>
> --
> {+} Jeff Squyres
> {+} jsquyres_at_[hidden]
> {+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> This list is archived at http://www.lam-mpi.org/MailArchives/lam/
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire camm_at_[hidden]
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
|
