Hi All,
We recently had some lam-killfile files persist across the
reboot of a machine, so that the processes i.d. no longer
existed or was owned by a different user than the one
expected.
This caused a problem that, while not difficult to diagnose,
was difficult to diagnose automatically via our usual heuristics.
Since the failures were due to:
a.) no such process
b.) pid owned by different user
I think that this should be detected by lam and should not
be fatal to the lamboot process.
Any reasonable difference of opinion on this point?
Anyone here watching Kyou Kara Maou?
Phil
--
Phil Ehrens <pehrens_at_[hidden]>| Fun stuff:
The LIGO Laboratory, MS 18-34 | http://www.ralphmag.org
California Institute of Technology | http://www.yellow5.com
1200 East California Blvd. | http://www.total.net/~fishnet/
Pasadena, CA 91125 USA | http://slashdot.org
Phone:(626)395-8518 Fax:(626)793-9744 | http://kame56.homepage.com
|
