At 02:44 AM 8/3/2004, Karl Hahn wrote:
>4) It _could_ be possible that I have mixed
>two versions of LAM (installed is a 6.5.4(!),
>I use a 7.1.beta). I tried to avoid problems
>using a new $PATH, $LD_LIBRARY_PATH, and
>-I/xxx in the Makefile. But I am not sure ...
PATH must be set up on each node so that the new installation is used by
lamboot and while running. I can't understand why updates of a supposedly
supported version of linux continue to use such old version of lam (and
binutils, gcc). If you configure your lam with --prefix=/usr it will
over-write the old one entirely, and there is no question of mix-up. Yes,
it will fail if the nodes don't all see the same lam installation on PATH.
Tim Prince
|
