On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Angel Tsankov wrote:
> I believe that this is not a serious issue and it will be fixed in a
> later version so that LAM/MPI commplies with the standrard a bit more.
Per my previous reply, I believe that LAM fully conforms to the standard
in this regard.
http://www.lam-mpi.org/MailArchives/lam/msg08131.php
--
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} jsquyres_at_[hidden]
{+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/
|