Jeff Squyres wrote:
> ..., I'm not aware of anything in 7.0 that interferes with dl- functions.
>
>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Richard Hadsell wrote:
>>
>>> My application uses dlopen (and the other dl- functions). I'm using
>>> Intel C++ 8.0 on Linux and trying to make this work with LAM 7.0.6.
>>> The first time my app tries to use one of the dl- functions (it
>>> calls dlerror to clear any old message) it crashes. This used to
>>> work with LAM 6.6b2. Is there any new magic I should know about?
>>>
>>> While I wait for help, I will try rebuilding LAM 6.6b2 with the
>>> current Intel C++ to see if there is a problem related more to the
>>> compiler than to the LAM source.
>>
I rebuilt LAM 6.6b2, and the application runs fine with it. The
environment is the same for both versions, so there must be a problem
with 7.0.6. What shall I do to debug it? Are there verbose options
that would give you more information? I have TotalView, but I don't
really know where to look in the LAM code for a problem.
That fact that it seg faults going into what should be the same library
code means that it has the wrong entry point for dlerror, or something
that dlerror relies on has been replaced or is missing. I can't think
of anything else.
--
Dick Hadsell 914-259-6320 Fax: 914-259-6499
Reply-to: hadsell_at_[hidden]
Blue Sky Studios http://www.blueskystudios.com
44 South Broadway, White Plains, NY 10601
|
