Arf. Second time today -- I totally lied.
We don't use libltdl in 7.0.x -- it will be used in 7.1.x.
Hence, I'm not aware of anything in 7.0 that interferes with dl-
functions.
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> It could well have something to do with the libtool "ltdl" library. We use
> the ltdl library as a portable form of dlopen() (and friends). On your
> system, it's probably acting as a front-end for the dl- functions. I don't
> know if there's incompatible state in there that it's setting up such that it
> will be hard/difficult for other parts of the application to use dl-
> functions...?
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Richard Hadsell wrote:
>
>> My application uses dlopen (and the other dl- functions). I'm using Intel
>> C++ 8.0 on Linux and trying to make this work with LAM 7.0.6. The first
>> time my app tries to use one of the dl- functions (it calls dlerror to
>> clear any old message) it crashes. This used to work with LAM 6.6b2. Is
>> there any new magic I should know about?
>>
>> While I wait for help, I will try rebuilding LAM 6.6b2 with the current
>> Intel C++ to see if there is a problem related more to the compiler than
>> to the LAM source.
>>
>>
>
>
--
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} jsquyres_at_[hidden]
{+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/
|
