Shyh -
I'm not sure why you are having trouble running recon. There are a
number of reasons that failures can occur. Can you send the actual
output of the failed recon?
We've tested with the XL compiler suite on OS X, so I'm surprised you
had trouble compiling with the default options. Can you send the
output from configure or config.log, as well as the output from where
the failure occurred?
Thanks!
Brian
On May 11, 2004, at 4:08 PM, Shyh-Chin Chen wrote:
> Brian, Geoge and whoever mac OSX users:
>
> I got burn using lam on Mac OSX fortran also. First, there is a
> precompiled
> version of LAM7.0.5 using Absoft PRO Fortran. You may find it in
> Absoft site
> http://www.absoft.com/Products/Clusters/lam_mpi.html
>
> However this version was built with fortran options such as
> -YEXT_NAMES=LCS
> and -YEXT_SFX=_. It means I have to use the same lowcase option in my
> source code and created some problems for me. So I rebuilt it following
> the same steps except those compiling options. The compiling went
> through
> smoothly, but when I do recon -v lamhosts, it couldnot find the node
> in my
> lamhosts, which contained only the machine where I launched recon
> command
> from. Weird.....
>
> I tried XLF compiler as well. FIrst I used no compiling options at all,
> and it failed
> somewhere in a no-man land, then I compiled it with -qextname (same as
> -YEXT_SFX=_ in PRO fortran), and it compiled, but failed in recon
> execution again.
>
> So I guess, I haven't got this "simple" installation to work yet. Any
> one
> can share
> experiences?
>
> Shyh Chen
>
>
>> On May 11, 2004, at 4:06 PM, George Duncan wrote:
>>
>>> I am new to the list. I am wanting to install lam-mpi
>>> on my mac g5. I note, however that the readme
>>> associated with lam 7.0.5 states quite clearly that
>>> fortran support is not included in the binary
>>> distribution. Alas, I am a fortran user. I have both
>>> xlf and absofts pro-fortran for the mac os x. Can
>>> someone please tell me whether there is support for
>>> fortran but not included for some reason? If so, where
>>> do I get that support?
>>
>> Since OS X doesn't include a fortran compiler by default, it didn't
>> make sense to build a binary image with fortran support (what fortran
>> compiler would we use?). However, LAM 7.0.5 has been tested with xlf
>> and absoft on OS X without problem. I would recommend building LAM
>> from source - it's really easy, just configure ; make ; make install.
>> There is even an Install Guide in PDF and PS format on the web page.
--
Brian Barrett
LAM/MPI developer and all around nice guy
Have a LAM/MPI day: http://www.lam-mpi.org/
|
