LAM/MPI General User's Mailing List Archives

From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-06 21:29:39

• Next message: Adel Essafi: "LAM: hi"
• Previous message: Marlon Régis Schmitz: "Re: LAM: RPM install"
• In reply to: Bogdan Costescu: "Re: LAM: RPM install"
• Next in thread: Marlon Régis Schmitz: "Re: LAM: RPM install"

On Thu, 6 May 2004, Bogdan Costescu wrote:

> Suggestion for LAM developers: would it make sense to split the LAM RPM
> into 'lam' and 'lam-devel' where 'lam-devel' would contain the things
> required to compile/link MPI programs, while 'lam' will contain only the
> runtime stuff. This is commonly done for many RPM packages.

IIRC, this has already been done for cAos RPMs. We've wondered if anyone
here would be interested...

-- 
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} jsquyres_at_[hidden]
{+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/

• Next message: Adel Essafi: "LAM: hi"
• Previous message: Marlon Régis Schmitz: "Re: LAM: RPM install"
• In reply to: Bogdan Costescu: "Re: LAM: RPM install"
• Next in thread: Marlon Régis Schmitz: "Re: LAM: RPM install"