I tried it out today, with no luck at all. The API has changed
considerably. I spent a few minutes trying to update the source, but I
just don't have enough experience with bproc to know if I'm even getting
anywhere. The new api seems complete, but things have changed just enough
to put it out of my reach. A competent C programmer could probably take
care of it in a day or two tops. Please let me know if anyone has this
working, or intends to develop it, I'd love to test it out!
-Steve
Jeff Squyres <jsquyres_at_[hidden]>
Sent by: lam-bounces_at_[hidden]
04/06/2004 08:41 AM
Please respond to General LAM/MPI mailing list
To: General LAM/MPI mailing list <lam_at_[hidden]>
cc:
Subject: Re: LAM: Bproc 4 support?
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 skearns_at_[hidden] wrote:
> I just setup a Clustermatic 4 cluster, which uses bproc 4, and I was
> wondering if anyone's had any luck getting LAM/MPI to work with bproc 4?
> I know there were some pretty big API changes from 3.X to 4, so I'm
> assuming that the current LAM only supports bproc 3.x.
We actually developed the BProc stuff entirely on other people's machines
-- we don't have BProc installed locally ourselves. We developed and
tested with BProc v3.2.5, so I don't know if it'll work with v4.x or not.
Could you give it a whirl and let us know how it goes?
--
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} jsquyres_at_[hidden]
{+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/
_______________________________________________
This list is archived at http://www.lam-mpi.org/MailArchives/lam/
|
