On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Andriy Y. Fedorov wrote:
> Could you please look into this question? If I do something wrong, why
> don't you point it out, or there's a mistake in the LAM FAQ?
> I attach one more test. In this test, if THREAD is defined, MPI is
> initialized and used in a separate thread. If it is not, the thread function
> is called directly. It fails for the same problem I've described earlier in
> the first case and succeeds in the second.
We aren't sure ecavtly what is going on, and are having trouble
duplicating the problem on our Solaris 8 machines. Can you send us the
output of 'mpicc -showme' and 'laminfo'?
My currently thought is that there is some strange (read: bad)
intereaction between Solaris threads (which are used by default in LAM
with Solaris) and Pthreads. But I don't know that for sure.
Brian
--
Brian Barrett
LAM/MPI developer and all around nice guy
Have a LAM/MPI day: http://www.lam-mpi.org/
|
