LAM/MPI General User's Mailing List Archives

From: Phil Ehrens (pehrens_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-23 18:12:38

• Next message: Timothy H. Kaiser: "Re: LAM: LAM and MPICH"
• Previous message: sutovas_at_[hidden]: "Re: LAM: LAM and MPICH"
• In reply to: sutovas_at_[hidden]: "Re: LAM: LAM and MPICH"
• Next in thread: Timothy H. Kaiser: "Re: LAM: LAM and MPICH"

sutovas_at_[hidden] wrote:
> LAM is much more user friendly and it has a nice documentation.
> A lot of people seem to be scared because LAM uses daemons.
> I had absoluately no bad experience with lamd.

Yeah, Ryoko was a demon, and she didn't seem so scary
after a while. People should be more open minded about
these things.

;^)

• Next message: Timothy H. Kaiser: "Re: LAM: LAM and MPICH"
• Previous message: sutovas_at_[hidden]: "Re: LAM: LAM and MPICH"
• In reply to: sutovas_at_[hidden]: "Re: LAM: LAM and MPICH"
• Next in thread: Timothy H. Kaiser: "Re: LAM: LAM and MPICH"