On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 11:11, Ben Reser wrote:
> 3. Rename wipe in lam-runtime to lamwipe.
If that follows the trend for postfix, cups etc it would be wipe.lam
instead. I would use lamwipe (or the name of the lam crew's choice) and
make wipe.lam a link to it, then link alternatives to wipe.lam.
> Rename the wipe command wipe.wipe.
Is there nothing more descriptive?
> Setting lam-runtime's wipe at a higher priority so in the
> case where both packages were installed lame-runtime would own the
> wipe command. This would avoid your concerns with lam users getting
> the secure file deletetion tool on accident.
Seconded.
Cheers; Leon
|
