LAM/MPI Development Mailing List Archives

What's New

Overview

Publications

MPI Resources

LAM Team

Other Implementations

Documentation

Tutorials

FAQ

Getting Help

LAM Tools

MPI Applications

Supported Versions

Download

Installation Process

Test Suite

Beta Releases

Source Code Access

Mailing Lists

Performance Data

Mirrors

Contact

License

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Liu Xuezhao (lxz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-08-22 01:51:05

Next message: Kevin R Bryant: "Kevin R Bryant/Gaithersburg/IBM is out of the office."
Previous message: Brian Barrett: "Re: Problem compiling lam 7.1.2"
Next in thread: Brian Barrett: "Re: Why LAM don't guarante binary compatibility between different releases?"
Reply: Brian Barrett: "Re: Why LAM don't guarante binary compatibility between different releases?"

Hi,
I wonder why LAM don't guarante binary compatibility between different releases? What is the difficulty to realize the binary compatibility?
Thanks!

Liu
2006-08-22

Next message: Kevin R Bryant: "Kevin R Bryant/Gaithersburg/IBM is out of the office."
Previous message: Brian Barrett: "Re: Problem compiling lam 7.1.2"
Next in thread: Brian Barrett: "Re: Why LAM don't guarante binary compatibility between different releases?"
Reply: Brian Barrett: "Re: Why LAM don't guarante binary compatibility between different releases?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view